I tend to ride outside rain or shine on a Saturday for about two hours. This winter I have decided do the Trainerroad workout.
Plan Builder has made all of my Saturday rides 90 minutes. Where there is a two hour version I have swapped that in. Some are only 90 minutes. What would be the best way to add 30 minutes?
Should I just extend the cool down, but up the target and do some sweet spot?
Adding 30 minutes of Sweet Spot at the end of a workout makes it a completely different one and you may not even be able to do it.
TR recommends to add Z2 (65/70% of FTP) at the end if you want to increase volume, try that first and then you could experiment with higher intensities or longer cooldowns at Z2,
Thatâs exactly what I do, extend the cooldown and up the intensity to whatever wattâs I need. For eample I added 15mins of endurance at the end of todays ride.
Iâm also experimenting with tagging on 15 mins of Z2. Sweetspot would be far too taxing, especially 30 minutes of it. Some 1 hour workouts barely have 30 mins of sweetspot.
I seem to remember Coach Chad saying that adding additional work (Z2) didnât always âplay nicelyâ after certain types of workouts. Iâll try and find the Podcast but Iâm almost 100% certain this was discussed.
Have a look at my profile, I think I have done what you have in mind: I started with mid-volume and created a training plan between mid- and high-volume. I have done that by adding zone 2 workouts (e. g. Taku or West Vidette -1), and replaced some of the workouts by +1 variants. I can definitely feel the difference compared to mid-volume. Even Z2 workouts after a sweetspot workout arenât as mentally easy anymore â which is exactly what the doctor ordered (in my case, I want to build some more toughness).
Extending the cool down is not appealing to me, it feels too easy. So I might create a custom 15-minute zone 2 workout, which cuts the warm up and goes straight into 60-70 % of FTP.
An extended cool down and a separate workout at 60/70% of FTP are the same thing, why would the cool down feel too easy? Personally, I think the cool down itâs more convenient so I have everything in a single ride.
For me the cool down usually selects 100~120 W, which is about 33 % of my FTP. Thatâs about half of what a Z2 workout is for me. (Of course, I could ignore the power recommendation and do my own thing, but thatâd feel wrong. )
The other way to think about it is, what are you trying to achieve, because each training should have a purpose.
So if you think of it that way, youâd rarely be ever wanting to do above z1 or z2 post workout. Like for example if you finish a bunch of hard intervals, either you went hard enough and got the stimulus you wanted, or you didnât. If the former, why do anything harder than âeasyâ? You hit it hard, got sufficient benefit, just be done. Every once in a while you might want to test yourself and really empty the tank, but thatâs rare and I think itâs best to approach that intentionally. And if the latterâif you didnât bury yourself deeply enoughâagain why do sweetspot? Better to add another interval or go harder in your intervals.
Training a variety of durations and energy systems in the same workout, I think you can do it and probably helpful sometimes as you prepare for race season, but I wouldnât do it regularly because load and recovery time get harder to predict and manage. And the more variables you toss in, the harder it is to identify the impact of each one.
Some people will be like âoh but TSS normalizes and you can compare apples to apples,â but I donât think thatâs true. TSS and CTL are not your fitness, they are proxies for estimating it.
I like the advice of doing zone 2. I donât race, but I do like long rides and doing Gran Fondoâs. I treat this extra time as just time in the saddle and being used to it. I think the backside needs saddle time