Have you been doing a TR plan for six months or more? If so which one?
Vote in the poll below.
- Low Volume
- Mid Volume
- High Volume
- Train Now
- I Don’t subscribe to TR
0 voters
Have you been doing a TR plan for six months or more? If so which one?
Vote in the poll below.
0 voters
Low Vol Plus:
I’m always between mid and low volume, had great results with both.
I am on Mid Volume Polarized because it’s only 2 hard workouts a week
Low volume. This is for my structured workouts (2-3 days per week). Ride outside for volume and occasionally long tempos and hill reps.
For whatever reason I have a really, really hard time doing endurance on the trainer. Luckily I live where year round riding is possible.
On TR plans I was average 5-7 hours/week, although I have done higher volume TR plans (SSB 1, Traditional Base). Last couple of years my target is 8-12 hours/week, but with various breaks last year was my highest volume year ever at 400 hours. That works out to just under 8 hours/week average for all of 2022.
Big picture if you look across the cycling world, 8-12 hours/week is intermediate volume.
Low volume here but I also do 2 strength sessions a week. I also work 12 hour days on a shift rotation so can’t really handle more than that at the moment.
You really need 2 polls:
I’m sure there are a bunch of folks doing TR Low Volume, but supplementing to actually hit “High Volume” weekly training volume
I’m actually on Time Crunch 30 but hit Low Vol.
As Chad said. Low volume plus. Two intensity/ interval sessions with some strength, a few commutes and longer easier rides.
High, i need the TSS
SSB Mid and today begins week 3
My original ramp test was right after a snowboarding and skiiing trip and my legs were toast so the FTP is about 6-7% low which is probably helping me adapt to structured training on the bike. As the weather warms up I’ll be doing a lot more riding outside but so far all of the workouts have been on the trainer with no technical difficulties.
I fit in the category you speak of. I was more interested in what % of people did MV/HV. It’s fair to assume a lot of us doing LV supplement with unstructured rides.
Mid volume polarized - supplementing with additional endurance to get the TSS/time I desire
I’m in the same boat: LV TR plan, but overall HV. Would be interested to see what % are in this group vs. doing HV TR plan vs. people doing LV TR Plan @ LV overall volume
High Volume Polarized Build. Generally stretching the Z2 rides by at least an extra 30 minutes, and at least one of them to 4+ hours. I’m lucky to have life circumstances that can support this load, and realize I’m in the minority.
I do LV which is 3.5 hours a week + an additional ~10 hours a week on the road, mostly unstructured but will try and incorporate a TR workout here or there. Avg TSS is ~850.
Max ride on trainer is 90 min. I lose my sh*t on anything over that. I find the weekly intensity to be about right. I’m sure it’s not the most productive method but I love riding the mountains for the sake of riding them and with the mild weather in SoCal it pretty much accommodates that all year around.
Agreed. Perhaps a bit harder to quantify. I do LV + 10 hours = ~850tss. I think this is still significantly easier than doing HV plan. Both in terms of intensity and motivation. As Nate says; not all TSS is created equal.
Low Volume plus endurance rides to get me to 16 hours give or take.
I completely agree that LV TR Plan + volume to hit / exceed the number of hours in a TR HV plan is very different workload. But I think it would be interesting / instructive to know who’s putting in “HV” hours, but structuring it different from a “HV” plan. Especially for folks new to structuring training who think “I have HV hours to ride / train, so I should be doing a HV plan”. Instead of “I have HV hours to train / ride, so I should do LV / MV plan and supplement that with other riding”