Just thought I’d post my very brief experience running concurrent measurements of the assioma uno and my gen1 hammer today. I did polar bear -3, an endurance workout in the 70-75% region. With the assioma pedals, I had avg 219/NP 224 (this signal went to zwift) while the hammer, being controlled by TR, was avg 218/NP 221. Pretty close on the overall scale, I might do a DCR Analyzer and get a bit more into the weeds, but it’s nice to see that overall the two are pretty close. I would suspect that the pedals picked up more of the out of saddle moments a bit better than the hammer. Thought it would be interesting to share.
Related topics
| Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| What's more likely to fluctuate in readings - assioma uno or gen1 Hammer? | 2 | 522 | September 18, 2019 | |
| Cycleops hammer power discrepancy with power meter increase over time | 6 | 369 | October 5, 2023 | |
| Might be time to recalibrate lol | 0 | 404 | October 4, 2020 | |
| Huge difference between Assioma uno and kickr core | 14 | 1314 | June 22, 2021 | |
| Power Meter for new bike | 5 | 1819 | January 14, 2020 |