Comparing Data screens Garmin -> Wahoo

I’ve been debating trying out an Element Bolt or Roam, I like the idea of something a little lighter, with easily accessible buttons, what’s always put me off is just how much data I can squeeze on my 1040.

My two main sceeens are;

Map, gears, wind, speed, avg power, hr, distance, cadence and time

Elapsed, gears, temp, wind, distance to destination, speed&average, hr&average, power&average&normalised, distance and cadence.

I know I’m not going to get quite as much on a bolt for example, but I’m wondering how close I can get?

What’s the max field count on a page? Are there fields or app that combine a data point and its average in one field? How many fields can I show with a map?


Iirc the maximum number of fields on the map screen is 5 or 6 and 9 or 11 on other screens (don’t have my roam here) but you can easily add screens and scroll through them with the press of a button

1 Like

For the Wahoo Elemnt (not sure if Roam and Bolt are the same, I think they are):

The limits for non-map, non-elevation screens are 11 data fields
On the map screen you can have up to 6 data fields
On the elevation screen you can have 7
You can have several custom screens with up to 11 data fields

You also can’t have the current speed/HR/power shown in the same data fields as average, but you can have a little arrow indicating if the current value is above or below average.

I don’t know where you’re getting wind data from, but Wahoo doesn’t have that and doesn’t allow third party data fields. So you you’ll lose that.

1 Like

I’m also really curious how accurate and useful that wind data really is?

Presumably your don’t have a wind sensor, rather the data is being pulled from some weather source, which is going to give either a predicted or delayed actual reading.

I just take a peak at the weather app before getting dressed to know generally what to expect. In the real world the wind speed and direction changes a lot, especially with foliage, buildings, hills etc blocking it sometimes.

2 Likes

Uses weather data, you can pick a few sources - I used a paid one, I forget the name, that seems pretty good.

It updates in real time as I’m riding, both in compass and windspeed. It’s usually a very good indication where I live (flat SE England), though it can often be off by a few degrees as you’ve alluded to, but I like having the information but I think it’s mostly a confirmation thing rather than anything useful beyond encouraging me to push for segment when I’ve got a strong tailwind :smiley:

There are places where it’s useless, though. Mallorca is one of them, I don’t know if it’s because Mallorca gets a few different winds, whether the reporting/forecasting is bad or what.

Plus one more physical “field”, left side LED:

  • HR zone
  • power zone
  • speed
  • approaching car approximity (with radar only, ofc)
1 Like

It’s surprisingly handy. With the map zoomed out enough + WindField you can quickly evaluate what wind you’ll be dealing with up the road - head/cross/tail/etc.

Accuracy depends where you are. Where I am it’s relatively flat with a lot of open space, so it’s good. Over in the Adelaide hills in January it wasn’t as useful.

1 Like

Was that because the hills interfered with the accuracy of your location or because they effectively blocked / manipulated the wind, depending on the profile around you?

At best it’ll update once every 5 mins. Still pretty good enough though.

I didn’t look too much into it. I assume the weather stations were too far away, possibly in the city/airport in Adelaide (almost dead flat).

1 Like