@kurt.braeckel what do you think about billat style vs sustained VO2? Do you have a preference for different athletes?
My favorite vo2 workout is megantic because of the hard start, and I’ve gotten up to Megantic+3 (5x5 of hard start followed by 125/88% 15-15s) in the past which is a bitch but held my HR very high for much longer duration.
I strongly prefer sustained VO2max intervals for training VO2max. If I want people to operate at higher power (e.g. MAP training), I’ll do more 30/15, 40/20 stuff. If someone just can’t/won’t do the sustained VO2 stuff, then I’ll prescribe some billat-style intervals for them but it’s a compromise IMO.
I give my true masters (60+) athletes more on/off stuff than anyone else. I did like the billats when I did them with TR, and I found them more effective than 30/30s for sustaining high efforts, but they’re crit training more than training VO2max in particular.
But again, I don’t worry about holding HR high. I want breathing as high as possible, LOTS of muscle contractions in the legs (high cadence) to force higher venous return. HR is essentially tertiary. It’s high by necessity, but I’m not looking for particular numbers or time spent above XX% of HR, personally.
I thought the purpose of 30/30s (and its variations) are just very different from VO2max workouts with long, sustained intervals (7 x 3 minutes, 5 x 4 minutes, etc.): the former aims to increase your anaerobic capacity. As far as I understand, neither is a substitute for the other, they just complement each other.
My recollection of the original billat study which i thought was 30/30 intervals, found that the athletes could get a fair amount of time at/near vo2max while having less sustained time at their associated vo2max running speed and thus less musculoskeletal stress than doing longer intervals at that speed.
I knew a very fast runner from Switzerland who during his lunch break would run a couple miles to the track, do 3k of “straights & bends” (fast turns, cruise the turns) and then run back. That 3k would be around 8:30-8:40. Then he’d do the real workout later that day.
And of course there is the Oregon 30-40s (continuous 200s).
30/30s just work. Yes, you need longer intervals, threshold, etc. but they have been a staple in a range of sports for a long time!
While I think you are correct regarding the original research and the idea behind it, I thought that 30-30s address a different part of system that contributes to VO2max performance. You can fail VO2max workouts in different ways, you could run out of steam (= energy) or out of breath. And I thought billats focus on the former (= anearobic capacity). Of course, nothing it binary here.
Again, that’s just a vague recollection, and I don’t even remember where I have read it. I’d be happy to be corrected — or to have further links.
In any case, it’d surprise me if the purpose of billats was to serve as an opener for longer VO2max work. I find billats easy and really like them. They are probably my favorite hard workout type. Long VO2max intervals are definitely not.
Yes… but it isnt in the example I gave… I didnt mention HR but it would be low in the circumstance I decribed <130 bpm. If you look at respiratory rate it peaks quickly followed some time later by HR, breathing becomes under control when HR has caught up with the demand and then HR also reduces and I am talking about running under threshold pace (it has got nothing to do with not knowing ones pacing zones or pacing incorrectly other than running too hard without warming up, for non warmed up pacing its pacing incorrectly but once you have you could run a hour or so with a relaxed respiratory rate at the same pace.) If you have experienced this it feel similar to breathing when at VO2max but isnt.
It is a real thing, I thought it was just something I had observed until I found a run coach had wrote about it.
Basically my point is you cannt just use breathing or HR in isolation.
As you said, it’s not binary. Usually pure anaerobic capacity efforts have much longer recoveries between the intervals to allow nearly full recovery and thus allowing you to go much harder during the intervals. Anaerobic capacity efforts could be something like 5 x 30s (all out) with 5 min recovery between.
30/30s are somewhere in between of pure VO2max workouts and pure anaerobic workouts mentioned above. Yes, the first few intervals are mainly anaerobic but once you extend the workout further and further the intervals become increasingly more aerobic (and power decreases).
Also, it should be noted that human body is aerobic in nature. Even if you produce energy anaerobically for a short period, the lactate clearance and ATP restoration is done aerobically - this is why 30/30s will stimulate both energy systems. Usually 30/30s will feel harder for athletes that have a high anaerobic capacity and likewise easier for “diesel” type athletes. Big anaerobic tank allows for harder efforts → larger oxygen debt → feels miserable.
One way I tried to handle this, is get to a point where breathing wise seems unsustainable, like my chest will explode anytime if I keep at it, then I would lower the effort just a tiny bit, to maximize time at this “ragged” state.
Long climbs are good for this. What can be done indoor is limited, for me anyways.
That is true. That’s why I said I use them to introduce intensity, not to train VO2max. One or two sets of 30/30 or 30/15 depending on the person just to get them ready for harder stuff. I don’t do it with everyone, but I see that it helps a lot of people, especially my older masters guys, get primed.
If they are proscribed as Billat did, then I think they have the desired effect on maximal oxygen uptake etc. The problem arises when people are given a 30/30 workout at a fixed percentage of FTP such as 120%. Plus there aren’t enough intervals to move past the initial anaerobic component. Done in resistance mode and go as hard as you can sustain with sufficient intervals for your current capacity and you’ll soon reach the breathing state covered above.
I have done some really hard workouts… with some really fast people. I don’t think a VO2 max has ever left anyone gasping or breathing like a “fish out of water.” No doubt VO2 workouts can really, really hurt… but if you are going to this point I don’t think you are doing it right.
Plenty of people describe it like this so I disagree, how can you say “has ever left” that is just your interpretation of the words and experience.
It is not a great term that commonly gets thrown around, how accurate it is depends on the meaning you take from the words.
I would be more inclined to say if you breathing isnt rapid but still deep and HR over LT2 then you are “doing it wrong” but you can pick fault with any description.
Really great article and multiple good concepts I never see in TR workouts, so I often find I either waste a ton of the workout reaching a vo2max state on shorter repeats or on longer ones they are just impossible to finish unless I treat it more like a hard threshold repeat and pace conservatively.
The hard depleting start and declining intervals make a lot more sense especially for anyone with strong 1 min power but proportionately weaker vo2max like myself.
I may try some of those suggestions on next 30/20 set by just blasting the early warm ups a lot harder to clear AC, no erg, overshoot power on first few to get HR up fast and just do what I can to push through rest of set at high cadence, whatever the power is. Pretty sure it will do more than any stock TR VO2 workout has ever done for me.
I’m probably gonna get a lot of push back since I’m not killing myself, nor recommending anyone doing so, during VO2max workouts. There’s a workout later on as well - fatigue management.