And I think that is a mistake by TR. For one, there is a question about how far this sees out, since all future weeks look the same as the current week if/when there are no R/Y days at hand. Weβve seen a few people ask for the predictive aspect of RLGL which makes total sense to me and would be more clear if/when there was an actual βGreenβ indicator on any/all days that RLGL has actually considered.
In parity with the Red Cross
& Yellow Yield
symbol, I think there should be a clear Green symbol like a
or some other positive / affirmative indicator. All that for practical use not to mention my persistent OCD complaint that Red Light Green Light has no actual βGreen Lightβ in use ![]()
Along with the above suggestion, perhaps the header of the green days could be shaded for quick sighting too, while leaving the main box white like normal. Just a matter of instant recognition without ambiguity.
ETA: The irony that this choice has to be addressed in the FAQ (due to the lack of a color in the namesake of the tool) seems like a clear reason to βfixβ this problem at the source (add green to the calendar).


