And I think that is a mistake by TR. For one, there is a question about how far this sees out, since all future weeks look the same as the current week if/when there are no R/Y days at hand. Weβve seen a few people ask for the predictive aspect of RLGL which makes total sense to me and would be more clear if/when there was an actual βGreenβ indicator on any/all days that RLGL has actually considered.
In parity with the Red Cross & Yellow Yield
symbol, I think there should be a clear Green symbol like a
or some other positive / affirmative indicator. All that for practical use not to mention my persistent OCD complaint that Red Light Green Light has no actual βGreen Lightβ in use
Along with the above suggestion, perhaps the header of the green days could be shaded for quick sighting too, while leaving the main box white like normal. Just a matter of instant recognition without ambiguity.
ETA: The irony that this choice has to be addressed in the FAQ (due to the lack of a color in the namesake of the tool) seems like a clear reason to βfixβ this problem at the source (add green to the calendar).