I’m looking to get myself into a TT bike for stage races with a $3000 hard cap budget (would be happier to keep it around $2k so I had some cash for accessories).
It seems like 8 year old ultegra equipped bike is readily available in that price range, but I would think the technology has come so far to almost make that a poor purchase. Is there much of a end-user-speed difference between TT frames from different companies or 2019 vs 2016 vs 2013?
2016 felt ultegra di2 vs 2021 argon 105? Those are both right at 3k…
The biggest thing you’ll notie with a bike that old is tire clearance…or lack thereof. Wider wheels were just starting to emerge then and not everyone had widened their frame designs to really accept them. So your wheel choices moving forward could be limited.
As an example, my 2009 Specialized Shiv TT cannot accept a Firecrest 808 from ~2012…I have to sand down the pads to make room.
As for speed difference, you won’t notice much…I’ll put my Shiv up against most bikes today. And a good position is what really counts. Get a good fitting done first and THEN make a bike purchase that fits you.
Position is king. Newer frames give you better rim and tire clearance, maybe disc brakes, etc., and all of that is valuable and good. But a) a cheap TT bike will be as good as a superbike if your position isn’t dialed in to be both aero and comfortable enough for the distance, and b) a superbike will be only marginally better than a cheap bike if your position is dialed in.
In my own experience, I was faster for a 56 mile bike leg on a road bike with aerobars (and a really, really good fit for the purpose) than a superbike that I’ve had trouble replicating that fit to. If I could go back (or, if I had an accurate record of the fit on that road bike) I would in a heartbeat.