USWE, Camelbak or Osprey Hydtration Pack

I’m narrowing down options for a hydration pack. I’m mainly looking for something to support long gravel races. I think I want a 1.5L to compliment my two bottles, but I could be swayed into a 2.5L if it makes more sense.

Priorities are weight, size (don’t want it too long to interfere with jersey pockets), and comfort.

So far I’ve narrowed it down to the following:

Camelback Chase Vest (worn by Ted King, Ali Tetrick, among others)

Osprey Katari 1.5L

USWE Outlander 2 (2L)

I’ve had the chase vest for two seasons and used it in multiple gravel races lasting 3-4 hours. For that duration, 1.5L isn’t enough, so a refill is needed. The only alternative is a bigger pack, which means more weight and may compromise your other needs. I really like the pockets on the Chase vest that put lots of things within easy reach on the bike.

1 Like

I’ve got the Chase Vest as well. I usually have two bottles of drink mix on the bike and water in the Camelbak. I really like the front pockets on the Chase. I usually have gels or chews in one side and plugs and CO2 in the other. Keeps everything in easy reach and I don’t need a top tube bag anymore.

I’m happy with the Camelbak but may try a USWE, especially since the TR guys seem to be fans.

AJ

1 Like

I’ve got a Chase and love it.

I’ve got a USWE and I ride both gravel and mtb on my mtb with it. Even on technical trails I forget it’s there. It still allows you full access to the pockets. I’ve never used the other two packs though so I can’t compare them.

2 Likes

I have and used both the Chase and USWE. USWE is more comfortable and now the Chase just feels awkward. Which is odd because I used to love the Chase. USWE also carries 2.0L.

3 Likes

The only downside to the uswe is that on hot days the chest harness can make unzipping jerseys difficult.

1 Like

Haven’t seen the Chase Vest, but I’m currently rocking a USWE and I love it. It absolutely rides higher on the back than other hydration packs. That took about an hour of riding to get used to, and now I can’t imagine going back.

For reference, mine is a bigger one (9L capacity, can’t remember the model name) that I got for MTB, but I’m going to race gravel with it this spring. 3L bladder, I’m hoping that’s enough for some cooler weather races of ~4 hours. I’m trying to avoid bottles altogether, because I prefer a pack and don’t want to stop.

2 Likes

Has anyone used the KLIM hydration packs yet? They look to be nearly identical to USWE but less expensive.

https://www.klim.com/Quench-Pak-4010-002

In my search for the perfect xc/trail pack I have now found one I really like. Thule Vital 8.
Lightweight, division pockets for tools etc, internal cargo space and a external pouch. It have side pockets that are easily accessible and have got a very smart system for managing the straw. I love it.

Previous packs have been camelbak mule, hawg, osprey talon and 2 Salomon trail agile packs.

2 Likes

I’m another USWE convert (thanks TR!). I haven’t used the Chase, but the USWE sits higher on the back and doesn’t move at all. It IS a bit tight. I live where it’s HOT, so having it off my center back has helped with keeping cool. Something to look for. Some packs come with a connection that requires you to push a narrow and stiff plastic tube over a connection that is extremely difficult for my puny cyclist arms. It’s absolutely worth the money to buy the bladder with the quick connect valve.

I now use a USWE for gravel and MTB water and put Maurten (another shout out for TR) in a bottle on the downtube so I have both my food and water easily accessible.

4 Likes

I may be the odd duck out here, but I’ve been really enjoying the Osprey Seral hip pack with 1.5L bladder. Very comfortable, room for tools, jacket, food. I wear it for MTB and road/gravel. Does not move around, keeps my back cool compared to a pack, and doesn’t hurt. No downsides for me. I’ve worn it for up to 4-5 hour rides.

Thanks all, this really helps. Sounds like the USWE and Camelbak are great options.

Does anybody know the difference btw the USWE Airborne and Outlander models? Looking at a 2-3L pack for gravel racing but can’t figure which would be most appropriate

It depends on which model and total volume vs hydration volume. When you say 2-3L, those are totally different packs. When you filter, make sure you think about 2L of water vs 2L total. If you mean 2-3L of water, then you want the pack with a 3L bladder. I tend to prefer just water in the bladder, so I also carry a bottle with Maurten in it for fuel. This might reduce the size water you need in the pack.

Also, will you want it to hold a spare tube, toolkit, pump, food, etc? If so, get the ones with the external pack attached. If not, you can fit a few small items like your id, a credit card and phone in the ones with no attachment.

I’d also recommend spending the extra to get the quick release hose attachment.

I got a USWE last month, no chance to use it yet but I was not impressed with the fitting you mentioned above. I thought they all shipped with the quick connect, I was a bit bummed when I had to deal with this on a high dollar item. Pretty lame, I spent 15 minutes trying to cure a leak from the connection. Hope the pack works.

2 Likes

+1 I find it almost invisible .

2 Likes

Good info, thanks! To clarify, I’m looking at 1.5-2.0L of water, with smallish storage - phone, keys, spare tube and patch kit, a few bars/gels/ziplock of powder (have mini pump attached to frame, medium sized saddle bag w/ tube, levers, bacon strips, patches, tire boot, co2). Thanks again.

1 Like

when you say quick release hose attachment, do you mean this:

https://www.uswe-sports.com/quick-coupling-set

See my post above from 16 days ago with photos. There is a fixed hose and a plug and play one.